|
This pollen diagram is from Chatsworth Bog in Livingston County
Illinois. Former Illinois State Museum palynologist James King
counted the pollen from this site (King 1981). This diagram was
made from data archived in the North American Pollen Database.
Pollen diagrams are a series of graphs for different species placed
side by side. The vertical axis is either depth or time. This
pollen diagram is plotted against time, in this case calendar years
before present (BP). The time scale was established by radiocarbon
dates, which were calibrated to calendar years. The horizontal axes
are percent of the total pollen from upland plants.
The pollen diagram shows that spruce forest existed at the
beginning of the record 14,000 years ago. By 13,000 years ago ash
had become very abundant replacing spruce, and by 12,000 years ago
elm and oak were rapidly increasing. The high abundance of ash and
elm between from 13,000 to nearly 9000 years ago indicates very wet
conditions because today these trees normally occur on poorly
drained soils such as those on floodplains. About 9000 years ago,
elm decreased while grass and ragweed increased, indicating the
development of prairie in the region. However, abundant oak pollen
indicates that oak woodland or savanna was widespread. By 8000
years ago, elm had recovered and remained fairly abundant until
about 5000 years ago, when it decreased again. The maximum
development of prairie was after about 5000 years ago. Other sites
from the Prairie Peninsula, especially Roberts Creek in northeast
Iowa (Baker et al. 1996), show that the driest period was from
about 5000-6000 years ago to about 3500 years ago. After about 3500
years ago, the climate became somewhat wetter, but prairie
persisted, due in large part to the annual prairie fires, which
inhibited tree invasion. For most of the past 14,000 years,
Chatsworth was a lake. By about 3000 years ago, sediment had almost
completely filled the basin, and it changed from a lake to a fen,
which deposited peat. Local pollen from the fen plants somewhat
complicate the interpretation of the pollen diagram after this
time.
|
|